Wade v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hubert Wade
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2019cv63075
Filed: December 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy K Altman
Referring Judge: Patrick M Hunt
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER CLOSING CASE re #6 Notice of Settlement; Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT and any scheduled hearings are TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 1/21/2020. See attached document for full details. (jao)
January 20, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Hubert Wade (Patti, Thomas)
January 6, 2020 Set Answer Due Deadline: Midland Credit Management, Inc., response due 1/20/2020 per DE 5 (pes) Modified on 1/6/2020 (pes).
January 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. The Defendant may respond to the Plaintiffs Complaint no later than January 20, 2020. In addition, the parties must file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties, no later than January 22, 2020. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 1/5/2020. (vve)
January 3, 2020 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. Attorney Cory William Eichhorn added to party Midland Credit Management, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Eichhorn, Cory)
December 13, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (cds)
December 12, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
December 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12223084, filed by Hubert Wade. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(Patti, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wade v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hubert Wade
Represented By: Thomas John Patti, III
Represented By: Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Represented By: Cory William Eichhorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?