TAMAS v. United States Attorney General et al
ZOLTAN TAMAS |
Field Office Director for Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and United States Attorney General |
0:2020cv60525 |
March 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Raag Singhal |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Northern District of Florida as case 4:20-cv-00188, filed 04/15/2020. (bb) |
Filing 11 ORDER TRANSFERRING VENUE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA; granting #7 Motion to Transfer Venue. All pending Motions are Denied. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 4/14/2020. See attached document for full details. (jao) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 0:20-cv-60525 electronically transferred out to Florida Northern. (jao) |
Civil Case Terminated per #11 ORDER TRANSFERRING VENUE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Closing Case. (jao) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Expedite by ZOLTAN TAMAS. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Garcia, David) |
Filing 9 Acknowledgment of Service by ZOLTAN TAMAS (Garcia, David) Modified text to reflect document on 3/23/2020 (pes). |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by ZOLTAN TAMAS. Replies due by 3/27/2020. (Garcia, David) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Transfer Venue by Field Office Director for Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Attorney General. (Diaz, Natalie) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Natalie Diaz on behalf of Field Office Director for Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Attorney General. Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party Field Office Director for Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party United States Attorney General(pty:dft). (Diaz, Natalie) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE.Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/13/2020. (eca) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Order to Show Cause by ZOLTAN TAMAS. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Garcia, David) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Field Office Director for Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Attorney General, and U.S. Attorney (jao) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. (jao) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus . Filing fee $ 5.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID AFLSDC-12582425, payment transferred from : 0:20-cv-60524-XXXX TAMAS v. Barr et a, filed by ZOLTAN TAMAS. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Garcia, David) Modified text on 3/12/2020 to reflect correct receipt number (bb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.