Muse Luxury Group LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
| Muse Luxury Group LLC |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| 0:2020cv61057 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Rogers, Robert) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Muse Luxury Group LLC. Attorney Joseph Benjamin Goldglantz added to party Muse Luxury Group LLC(pty:pla). Replies due by 7/21/2020. (Goldglantz, Joseph) |
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Joint Scheduling Report, Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements due by 7/31/2020 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 6/1/2020. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Filing 4 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Nicole Sodano, mailing date June 1, 2020, (pt) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Scottsdale Insurance Company. Responses due by 6/12/2020 (Rogers, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mee) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-12954526, payment transferred from : 20cv61052 Muse Luxury Goup v Scottsdale Insurance Company, filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Copies of All Process)(Rogers, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Muse Luxury Group LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Muse Luxury Group LLC | |
| Represented By: | Nicole Sodano |
| Represented By: | Joseph Benjamin Goldglantz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Andrew P. Rock |
| Represented By: | Robert Lee Rogers, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
