Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 188708 v. Coquelet et al
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 188708 |
Centennial Bank, NA and Guillermo Coquelet |
0:2020cv61185 |
June 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodney Smith |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE by Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 188708 Notice of Service of Process (Dmiszewicki, Aaron) |
Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT; Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/1/2020 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/7/2020. See attached document for full details. (jao) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Guillermo Coquelet. (yha) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Centennial Bank, NA. (yha) |
Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith (yha) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against Centennial Bank, NA, Guillermo Coquelet. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13035916, filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 188708. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B)(Davant, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.