Riley v. Town of Pembroke Park
Plaintiff: Michelle A Riley
Defendant: Town of Pembroke Park
Case Number: 0:2020cv61329
Filed: July 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodolfo A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2020 Filing 15 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order of Remand to: 17th Judicial Circuit. State Court Case Number: CACE20-004289 (cqs)
August 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Remand to State Court. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/26/2020. See attached document for full details. (kbm)
August 26, 2020 Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION to Remand to State Court by Michelle A Riley. (Remer, Jason)
August 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why Motion to Dismiss should not be granted by default. Show Cause Response due by 8/28/2020. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/25/2020. See attached document for full details. (gp)
July 30, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss #7 Amended Complaint by Town of Pembroke Park. Responses due by 8/13/2020 (Hochman, Jeffrey)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER of Instructions for Setting a Settlement Conference. The District Court has entered an Order [DE 9] referring the case to the undersigned for a settlement conference. Accordingly, counsel for the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer, either telephonically or in person, for the purpose of determining a date on which to conduct the settlement conference. Counsel for Plaintiff shall telephone Chambers (954-769-5450) with no fewer than three dates (for the full business day) on which the parties and their counsel will be available for the settlement conference, within the time period allotted by the District Court's Order (prior to the due date for Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Claim). Following the submission of proposed dates, the undersigned will enter an order setting the settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 7/29/2020. (osd)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER IN ACTIONS BROUGHT UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT., ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss for Settlement Conference., (Statement of Claim due by 8/4/2020., Responses due by 8/18/2020) Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 7/28/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds)
July 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #3 Motion to Dismiss pursuant to the filing of #7 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 7/23/2020. (btr)
July 23, 2020 Filing 7 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Town of Pembroke Park, filed by Michelle A Riley.(Remer, Jason)
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report due by 7/29/2020 Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 7/16/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds)
July 13, 2020 Filing 5 STATUS REPORT by Town of Pembroke Park (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hochman, Jeffrey)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING REMOVAL STATUS REPORT, ( Removal Status Report due by 7/15/2020.) Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 7/8/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds)
July 8, 2020 Filing 3 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT by Town of Pembroke Park. Responses due by 7/22/2020 (Hochman, Jeffrey)
July 2, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
July 2, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13122498, filed by Town of Pembroke Park. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Hochman, Jeffrey) Text Modified on 7/2/2020 (cds). No Answer/Motion to Dismiss Filed.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riley v. Town of Pembroke Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle A Riley
Represented By: Jason Saul Remer
Represented By: Elizabeth D. Carlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Town of Pembroke Park
Represented By: Jeffrey Lawrence Hochman
Represented By: Damian H Albert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?