Geathers v. City of Margate et al
Plaintiff: Derrian Geathers
Defendant: Margate Police Department, City of Margate and Adam Speziale
Case Number: 0:2020cv61623
Filed: August 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodney Smith
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2020 Filing 19 Proposed SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by City of Margate, Margate Police Department, Adam Speziale (Reynolds, Lyman)
September 30, 2020 Filing 18 Election to Jurisdiction for Final Disposition of Motions . Filed by City of Margate, Margate Police Department, Adam Speziale (Reynolds, Lyman)
September 30, 2020 Filing 17 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by City of Margate, Margate Police Department, Adam Speziale identifying Other Affiliate Preferred Governmental Insurance Trust (PGIT) for Adam Speziale, City of Margate, Margate Police Department (Reynolds, Lyman)
September 30, 2020 Filing 16 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by City of Margate, Margate Police Department, Adam Speziale (Reynolds, Lyman)
September 21, 2020 Filing 15 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Derrian Geathers (Saunders, Nathan)
September 11, 2020 Filing 14 Summons Issued as to City of Margate. (cbr)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #11 Motion for Issuance of Summons. A court order is not needed for issuance of a summons. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/1/2020. (cbn)
August 31, 2020 Filing 12 Defendant's REPLY to #10 Response in Opposition to Motion by City of Margate, Margate Police Department, Adam Speziale. (Reynolds, Lyman)
August 25, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION for Issuance of Summons by Derrian Geathers. (Saunders, Nathan)
August 24, 2020 Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 Amended MOTION to Quash filed by Derrian Geathers. Replies due by 8/31/2020. (Saunders, Nathan)
August 12, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathan Mazique Saunders on behalf of Derrian Geathers. Attorney Nathan Mazique Saunders added to party Derrian Geathers(pty:pla). (Saunders, Nathan)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/30/2020 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/12/2020. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
August 11, 2020 Filing 7 Amended MOTION to Quash by Margate Police Department. (Reynolds, Lyman)
August 11, 2020 Filing 6 Amended MOTION to Quash by City of Margate. (Reynolds, Lyman)
August 11, 2020 Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Adam Speziale. (Reynolds, Lyman)
August 11, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Civil Cover Sheet by City of Margate, Margate Police Department, Adam Speziale (Reynolds, Lyman)
August 11, 2020 Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (mc)
August 11, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mc)
August 11, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13330070, filed by Adam Speziale, Margate Police Department, City of Margate.(Reynolds, Lyman)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Geathers v. City of Margate et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Margate Police Department
Represented By: Lyman Hawley Reynolds, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Margate
Represented By: Lyman Hawley Reynolds, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Speziale
Represented By: Lyman Hawley Reynolds, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derrian Geathers
Represented By: Samuel Yeboah
Represented By: Nathan Mazique Saunders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?