Shinn v. CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC
| Ryan Shinn |
| CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC |
| 0:2020cv61891 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER Consolidating Cases 20cv61891 & 20cv81362. All pleadings and papers shall be filed in Case No. 20-CV-81362-WPD. Case No. 20-cv-61891 is hereby CLOSED. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 11/2/2020. See attached document for full details. Associated Cases: 9:20-cv-81362-WPD, 0:20-cv-61891-WPD (kpe)
|
| Filing 25 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #20 Order to Show Cause by CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC. (Feldman, Alan) |
| Cases associated. (kpe) |
| Civil Case Terminated per DE #26 Order. Closing Case. (kpe) |
| Filing 24 RESPONSE to #23 Notice of Supplemental Authority, by Ryan Shinn. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 23 Notice of Supplemental Authority re #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #9 Notice of Supplemental Authority, by CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Feldman, Alan) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #20 Order to Show Cause by Ryan Shinn. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 21 [order] restricted/sealed until further notice. (ail) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER To Show Cause Why Cases Should Not Be Consolidated. Show Cause Response due by 11/4/2020. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/28/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER OF TRANSFER to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 10/29/2020. Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 10/28/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 18 Notice of Supplemental Authority re #11 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss by Ryan Shinn (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - LaGuardia, et al. v. Designer Brands, Inc.) (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 17 STATUS REPORT Removal Status Report by CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC (Feldman, Alan) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Amended Reply filed by CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC. (Feldman, Alan)Text Modified on 10/23/2020 (ail). |
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC. (Feldman, Alan) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response to CMR's Notice of Supplemental Authority [DE 10] filed by CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC. (Feldman, Alan) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Ryan Shinn. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC. Replies due by 10/22/2020. (Feldman, Alan) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Ryan Shinn. Replies due by 10/22/2020. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #9 Notice of Supplemental Authority, by Ryan Shinn. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Supplemental Authority re #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order) (Feldman, Alan) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER REQUIRING REMOVAL STATUS REPORT. Status Report due by 10/23/2020. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 9/30/2020. See attached document for full details. (amb)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court , #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint. Responses due by 10/16/202. SEE DE 7 ORDER (ail) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 the parties' Joint Motion to File Responses. The parties shall file their respective responses in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Remand by October 16, 2020 . Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 9/30/2020. (kbm)
|
| Filing 6 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Ryan Shinn (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court by CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC. (Feldman, Alan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Ryan Shinn. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC. Responses due by 10/2/2020 (Feldman, Alan) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Ryan Shinn, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13538394, filed by CMR Construction and Roofing. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Summon(s), #7 Summon(s), #8 Docket Sheet, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N)(Feldman, Alan) (No Answer or Motion to Dismiss Filed) Text Modified on 9/17/2020 (amb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shinn v. CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Alan Seth Feldman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ryan Shinn | |
| Represented By: | Manuel Santiago Hiraldo |
| Represented By: | Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
