BOBE v. TRIANGLE AUTO CENTER, INC.
Plaintiff: ROBERT BOBE
Defendant: TRIANGLE AUTO CENTER, INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as TOYOTA OF HOLLYWOOD
Case Number: 0:2020cv61901
Filed: September 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William P Dimitrouleas
Referring Judge: Lurana S Snow
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2611
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING COMPLETION OF ARBITRATION. ORDER granting #5 Motion to Stay. This action is hereby STAYED pending resolution of the arbitration proceeding; The parties are required to submit a status report ninety (90) days following the date of this Order and every ninety (90) days thereafter; The Clerk shall administratively CLOSE this case. Motions Terminated: #5 Joint MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Arbitration filed by TRIANGLE AUTO CENTER, INC.. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/13/2020. See attached document for full details. (amb)
September 29, 2020 Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Arbitration by TRIANGLE AUTO CENTER, INC.. Attorney Aaron Jarett Reed added to party TRIANGLE AUTO CENTER, INC.(pty:dft). Responses due by 10/13/2020 (Reed, Aaron)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/22/2020. See attached document for full details. (amb)
September 18, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to TRIANGLE AUTO CENTER, INC.. (amb)
September 18, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb)
September 18, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against TRIANGLE AUTO CENTER, INC.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13546383, filed by ROBERT BOBE. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Storch, Noah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOBE v. TRIANGLE AUTO CENTER, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRIANGLE AUTO CENTER, INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as TOYOTA OF HOLLYWOOD
Represented By: Aaron Jarett Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT BOBE
Represented By: Noah E Storch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?