Arevalo v. Doe U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration Agents #1 through #5 et al
| Miguel Arevalo |
| DOE U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINSTRATION AGENTS #1 through #5, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, Executive Office for the United States Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA and Doe U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration Agents #1 through #5 |
| 0:2021cv60102 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #7 Motion to Dismiss Claims Against Defendants United States Drug Enforcement Administration and Executive Office of the United States Attorneys. Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 3/15/2021. (cbn)
|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Justice c/o U.S. Attorney's Office (nc) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA,(nc) |
| Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Miguel Arevalo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Summon(s) USAO SUMMONS, #10 Summon(s) DOJ SUMMONS)(Light, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, by Executive Office for the United States Attorney, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. Attorney Johnathan Douglas Lott added to party Executive Office for the United States Attorney(pty:dft), Attorney Johnathan Douglas Lott added to party U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration(pty:dft). Responses due by 3/11/2021 (Lott, Johnathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Compliance with [DE 5] by Miguel Arevalo re 5 Order on Motion to Seal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B- Redacted, #2 Exhibit E- Redacted) (Light, Gregory) |
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Exhibits Attached to Plaintiff's Complaint. The Clerk has sealed Exhibits B [DE 1-2] and E [DE 1-5]. The Exhibits shall remain sealed until further order of the Court. Plaintiff shall file redacted versions of Exhibits B and E in the public record by January 25, 2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/21/2021. (cbn)
|
| Filing 4 Plaintiff's MOTION to Seal EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT per Local Rule 5.4 by Miguel Arevalo. (Light, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Doe U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration Agents #1 through #5, Executive Office for the United States Attorney, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14226060, filed by Miguel Arevalo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Summon(s) USAO, #7 Summon(s) DOE Defendants, #8 Summon(s) DEA, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Light, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
