Clarke et al v. PNC Bank
| Aidar Oruzbaev and Julius Clarke |
| PNC Bank |
| 0:2021cv60852 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE Complaint. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 4/27/2021. See attached document for full details. (kbm)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Julius Clarke, Aidar Oruzbaev. (jbs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jbs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Tortious Interference with an International Business Contract against PNC Bank. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Julius Clarke, Aidar Oruzbaev. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jbs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
