Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
Gizelle Moore Curry |
Commissioner of Social Security |
0:2023cv61074 |
June 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jared M Strauss |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION AND SCHEDULING. Notice of consent or motion for case reassignment due by 8/16/2023. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment/Initial Brief due by 9/1/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 8/2/2023. See attached document for full details. (emd) |
Filing 4 Social Security Transcript/Answer/Administrative Record filed. Transcripts date: 7/12/23. Pages: 1-1331 (Attachments: #1 pages 861-1331)(Sausser, Jill) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jill Sausser on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Jill Sausser added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft). (Sausser, Jill) |
Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss (ls) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16669197, filed by Gizelle Moore Curry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Zakhvatayev, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.