Richemont International SA et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, And Unincorporated Associations
| Richemont International SA, Cartier International A.G., Lange Uhren GMBH, Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G. and Van Cleef & Arpels SA |
| The Individuals, Business Entities, And Unincorporated Associations |
| 0:2023cv62422 |
| December 29, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/2/2024. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 7 [motion] restricted/sealed until further notice. (700785) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 6 [motion] restricted/sealed until further notice. (700785) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 9 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (700785) |
| Filing 5 Plaintiff's MOTION to Seal per Local Rule 5.4 by Cartier International A.G., Lange Uhren GMBH, Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Seal) (Gaffigan, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cartier International A.G., Lange Uhren GMBH, Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA identifying Corporate Parent Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA for Cartier International A.G., Lange Uhren GMBH, Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G., Richemont International SA, Van Cleef & Arpels SA (Gaffigan, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibits) (nan) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17176515, filed by Van Cleef & Arpels SA, Richemont International SA, Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Lange Uhren GMBH, Cartier International A.G., Officine Panerai A.G.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the IWC Trademarks, #3 Exhibit 2 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the JAEGER-LECOULTRE Trademarks, #4 Exhibit 3 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the PIAGET Trademarks, #5 Exhibit 4 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the ROGER DUBUIS Trademarks, #6 Exhibit 5 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the VACHERON CONSTANTIN Trademarks, #7 Exhibit 6 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the CARTIER Trademarks, #8 Exhibit 7 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the A. LANGE & SOHNE Trademarks, #9 Exhibit 8 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the MONTBLANC Trademarks, #10 Exhibit 9 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the PANERAI Trademarks, #11 Exhibit 10 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the VAN CLEEF Trademarks)(Gaffigan, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
