Ponder
| Josephine Ponder |
| 0:2023mc60899 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER. Dismissing Case / Closing Case. (Without Prejudice) Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 5/26/2023. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 5/15/2023 in the amount of $ 49.00, receipt number 8385. (scn) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. (drz) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Filing Declaration of Ownership. Filing fee $ 49.00, filed by Josephine Ponder. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(drz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ponder | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Josephine Ponder | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
