Woodson v. Dept. of Corrections
| 1:2002cv21921 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER denying 129 Motion to Supplement Amended Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Senior Judge Patricia A. Seitz on 11/12/2020. See attached document for full details. (pa00)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER Denying 123 125 Motions for Certificate of Appealability and Denying 126 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Patricia A. Seitz on 9/29/2020. See attached document for full details. (pa00)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER Dismissing 115 Petitioner's Amended Motion for Relief from Judgment; Order Denying Motion for Injunctive Order and Compelling Discovery 114 119 ; and Order Denying as moot Motion for Relief from Judgment 112 and Motion to Amend Relief from Judgment 113 . Signed by Senior Judge Patricia A. Seitz on 8/10/2020. See attached document for full details. (pa00)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woodson v. Dept. of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
