Monterrey v. Groupware International, Inc. et al
| 1:2010cv23298 |
| September 13, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER approving settlement and DISMISSING CASE. The Court retains jurisdiction until 9/24/2012 to enforce the settlement terms. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 6/6/2012. (mkr)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER setting fairness hearing, (Fairness Hearing set for 6/6/2012 10:15 AM in Miami Division before Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan). Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 5/25/2012. (mkr)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER striking 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion for Extension of Time; granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion the plaintiffs shall serve Mr. Dierking by 8/22/11; denying 53 Motion, the plaintiffs shall serve Mr. Dierking by 8/22/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 7/21/2011. (mkr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Monterrey v. Groupware International, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
