Kol B'Seder, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate No. 154766 under Contract No. B0621MASRSWV15BND et al
Plaintiff: Kol B'Seder, Inc.
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate No. 154766 under Contract No. B0621MASRSWV15BND and Glass-Tech Corp.
Case Number: 1:2016cv22237
Filed: June 16, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Miami Office
County: Miami-Dade (Office: Miami)
Presiding Judge: Marcia G. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Edwin G. Torres
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 100 OMNIBUS ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT denying as moot 47 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 48 Motion in Limine; granting 66 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 69 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 85 Motion in Limi ne; denying as moot 86 Motion in Limine. Closing Case. Motions Terminated: 85 Defendant's MOTION in Limine as to Damages filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate No. 154766 under C ontract No. B0621MASRSWV15BND, 86 Defendant's MOTION in Limine as to Causation filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate No. 154766 under Contract No. B0621MASRSWV15BND, 66 Defendant' s MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate No. 154766 under Contract No. B0621MASRSWV15BND, 48 Plaintiff's MOTION in Limine to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Stewart Hutcheson filed by Kol B'Seder, Inc., 69 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claims and On Count II of Counterclaim filed by Glass-Tech Corp., 47 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Opinion of David Mo rris or his Phantom Report filed by Glass-Tech Corp.. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 5/30/2017. (tm) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kol B'Seder, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate No. 154766 under Contract No. B0621MASRSWV15BND et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kol B'Seder, Inc.
Represented By: Domingo Carlos Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate No. 154766 under Contract No. B0621MASRSWV15BND
Represented By: Neil Bayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glass-Tech Corp.
Represented By: Scott Andrew Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?