Gomez v. SeatGeek, Inc. et al
| Andres Gomez |
| SeatGeek, Inc., Miami Marlins, L.P. and SeatGeek, Inc. doing business as www.seatgeek.com |
| 1:2017cv22881 |
| July 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Miami-Dade (Office: Miami) |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ENDORSED ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice [ECF No. 21]. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 21 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Andres Gomez (Dinin, Scott) |
|
Filing 20
ENDORSED ORDER cancelling Status Conference set for December 1, 2017, in light of Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement [ECF No. 19], which indicates that this matter has settled in full. The parties are hereby notified that, within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order, they must file a Stipulation or Notice of Dismissal and/or Settlement Agreement along with any other pertinent document necessary to conclude this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Settlement by Andres Gomez (Dinin, Scott) |
|
Filing 18
ENDORSED ORDER setting this case for a status conference at 9:30 a.m. on December 1, 2017. The parties should be prepared to address the Courts Notice of Court Practice in cases filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12181 et seq. This case will be called at the same time as several other ADA cases pending before the Court. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
|
Filing 17
ENDORSED ORDER staying and administratively closing case in light of Defendant's Report Pursuant to This Court's Notice of Court Practice in ADA Cases [ECF No. 16]. Within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, Defendant shall file with the Court a detailed remediation report regarding its efforts toward remediation. Every sixty (60) days thereafter, the parties shall file with the Court joint status reports regarding the website modifications until the defects specified in the Complaint are remediated. Either party may move to reopen this matter. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69.
|
| Filing 16 REPORT REGARDING Court's Notice of Court Practice in ADA Cases by SeatGeek, Inc. (Storper Joseph, Beth) |
| Reset Answer Due Deadline per 15 Order: SeatGeek, Inc. response due 10/3/2017. (asl) |
|
Filing 15
ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before October 3, 2017. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the Notice of Court Practice on or before September 25, 2017. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 13 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to 8 Notice of Court Practice,,, by SeatGeek, Inc.. Attorney Anne Marie Estevez added to party SeatGeek, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Estevez, Anne) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #7 Amended Complaint , Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to file Corporate Disclosure Statement ( Responses due by 9/20/2017) by SeatGeek, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Storper Joseph, Beth) |
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the Notice of Court Practice on or before September 11, 2017. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to file its response to the Notice of Court Practice dated August 25,2017 re 8 Notice of Court Practice,,, by SeatGeek, Inc.. Attorney Beth Hilary Storper Joseph added to party SeatGeek, Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 9/15/2017 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-)(Storper Joseph, Beth) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #7 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Andres Gomez. SeatGeek, Inc. served on 8/21/2017, answer due 9/11/2017. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Dinin, Scott) |
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12181 et seq. In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED as follows: Within fourteen (14) days of service of the Complaint, Defendant shall file a report with the Court indicating whether it (he/she/they) admit to the violations and intend to remediate the property. If so, Defendant shall include a timeline for remediation. If, upon review of the report, the Court finds that Defendant intends to remediate the property in a timely manner, the Court will administratively close the case pending remediation. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 7 Plaintiff's AMENDED COMPLAINT against SeatGeek, Inc. filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Andres Gomez.(Dinin, Scott) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave of the Court to Amend the Complaint and Dismiss Defendant Miami Marlins, L.P. With Prejudice. Plaintiff shall separately re-file the amended complaint pursuant to Local Rule 15.1. Defendant Miami Marlins, L.P. is dismissed from this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, and Dismiss Defendant Miami Marlins, L.P. With Prejudice by Andres Gomez. Responses due by 9/6/2017 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Dinin, Scott) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Andres Gomez. Miami Marlins, L.P. served on 8/3/2017, answer due 8/24/2017. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Dinin, Scott) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Miami Marlins, L.P., SeatGeek, Inc. (lrz1) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (lrz1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-9933577, filed by Andres Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Defendant Miami Marlins, L.P., #3 Summon(s) Defendant SeatGeek, Inc.)(Dinin, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
