The Tesalia Springs Company v. Krones AG
| The Tesalia Springs Company |
| Krones AG |
| 1:2018cv24273 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Cecilia M Altonaga |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0009 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated, per [ECF No. 7]. Closing Case. (ps1) |
Filing 7
ORDER denying #6 Motion for Court-Directed Alternative Service of Process. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 1/14/2019. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION Petitioner's Motion for Court-Directed Alternative Service of Process re #1 Motion (Complaint) to Confirm/Vacate/Modify or Correct Arbitration Award, #5 Order, Set/Reset Deadlines, #4 Summons Issued by The Tesalia Springs Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Petition to Confirm & Enforce Arbitral Award, #2 Exhibit B - Email Award to Counsel, #3 Exhibit C - Email to Arbitrator, #4 Exhibit D - Walid N. Eid's Business Card)(Lorenzo, Richard) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER requiring service to be perfected by 1/15/2019. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 11/13/2018. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Krones AG. (jas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by The Tesalia Springs Company re #1 Motion (Complaint) to Confirm/Vacate/Modify or Correct Arbitration Award, Notice of Filing Proposed Summons (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Summons to Krones Ag) (Lorenzo, Richard) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
| Filing 1 Motion (Complaint) to Confirm and Enforce Arbitration Award. Filing fee $400.00 receipt number 113C-11082400, filed by The Tesalia Springs Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lorenzo, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Tesalia Springs Company v. Krones AG | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Krones AG | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Tesalia Springs Company | |
| Represented By: | Richard C. Lorenzo |
| Represented By: | Javier Peral, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
