Odom v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.
Plaintiff: Kerri Odom
Defendant: Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.
Case Number: 1:2018cv24780
Filed: November 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Cecilia M Altonaga
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2018 Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.. Attorney Natasha K. Alcivar added to party Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.(pty:dft). (Alcivar, Natasha)
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report due by 1/14/2019. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 12/19/2018. See attached document for full details. (ar2)
December 19, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Kerri Odom. Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. served on 12/14/2018, answer due 1/4/2019. (Gerson, Nicholas)
December 13, 2018 Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as per DE #4 : Show Cause Response due by 2/13/2019. (lk)
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that on or before February 13, 2019, Plaintiff shall perfect service upon the Defendant or show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to perfect service of process. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 12/13/2018. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
November 16, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. (ar2)
November 15, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar2)
November 15, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11164394, filed by Kerri Odom. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Gerson, Nicholas) Modified text on 11/16/2018 (ar2).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Odom v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTD.
Represented By: Natasha K. Alcivar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kerri Odom
Represented By: David L Markel
Represented By: Edward Steven Schwartz
Represented By: Philip Maurice Gerson
Represented By: Nicholas I. Gerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?