Sobalvarro v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Evelyn Sobalvarro
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2018cv24981
Filed: November 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Darrin P Gayles
Referring Judge: Alicia M Otazo-Reyes
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed U.S. Attorney served on 12/14/2018, answer due 2/12/2019. (mc)
November 30, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ail)
November 30, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Evelyn Sobalvarro re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s)) (Marder, Lilli)
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service Ordered but Summonses NOT provided for USM Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes on 11/29/2018. See attached document for full details. (sl)
November 29, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Evelyn Sobalvarro. (ail)
November 29, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles and Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail)
November 29, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy Berryhill Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Evelyn Sobalvarro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Marder, Lilli)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sobalvarro v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evelyn Sobalvarro
Represented By: Lilli W. Marder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Noticing Social Security US Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?