Evertec Group, LLC v. CheckAlt Eras, Inc.
Plaintiff: Evertec Group, LLC
Defendant: CheckAlt Eras, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv25220
Filed: December 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Darrin P Gayles
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2019 Filing 21 MOTION TO DISMISS #16 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Evertec Group, LLC. Responses due by 2/22/2019 (Briz, Brian)
February 4, 2019 Filing 20 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Evertec Group, LLC (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order Election to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge for Final Disposition)(Briz, Brian)
February 4, 2019 Filing 19 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Evertec Group, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Evertec Intermediate Holdings LLC, Other Affiliate Evertec, Inc. for Evertec Group, LLC (Briz, Brian)
January 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ENDORSED ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before February 4, 2019, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles See attached document for full details. (hs01)
January 18, 2019 Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CheckAlt Eras, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent CheckAlt, LLC for CheckAlt Eras, Inc. (Sanchez, Francisco)
January 18, 2019 Filing 16 CheckAlt Eras, Inc.'s ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM against Evertec Group, LLC by CheckAlt Eras, Inc.. (Sanchez, Francisco)
January 4, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Claudia Ojeda on behalf of CheckAlt Eras, Inc.. Attorney Claudia Ojeda added to party CheckAlt Eras, Inc. (pty:dft). (Ojeda, Claudia)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before January 18, 2019. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
January 2, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David A. Coulson on behalf of CheckAlt Eras, Inc.. Attorney David A. Coulson added to party CheckAlt Eras, Inc. (pty:dft). (Coulson, David)
December 28, 2018 Attorney David A. Coulson terminated per DE #11 . (jua)
December 28, 2018 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by CheckAlt Eras, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sanchez, Francisco)
December 28, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE of Striking #9 Notice of Attorney Appearance filed by Evertec Group, LLC by CheckAlt Eras, Inc. (Sanchez, Francisco)
December 28, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Francisco Oscar Sanchez on behalf of CheckAlt Eras, Inc.. Attorney Francisco Oscar Sanchez added to party CheckAlt Eras, Inc. (pty:dft). (Sanchez, Francisco)
December 28, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David A. Coulson on behalf of Evertec Group, LLC. Attorney David A. Coulson added to party Evertec Group, LLC (pty:pla). (Coulson, David)
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Maria Elena Martinez Casado is permitted to appear before this Court on behalf of Plaintiff for all purposes relating to this action. The clerk is directed to provide Notice of Electronic Filings to Ms. Martinez Casado at mmartinez@pmalaw.com. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. Orete R. Ramos is permitted to appear before this Court on behalf of Plaintiff for all purposes relating to this action. The clerk is directed to provide Notice of Electronic Filings to Orete Ramos at oramos@pmalaw.com. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
December 19, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Evertec Group, LLC. CheckAlt Eras, Inc. served on 12/14/2018, answer due 1/4/2019. (Miranda, Manuel)
December 17, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Mara Elena Martnez Casado. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11246124 by Evertec Group, LLC. Responses due by 1/2/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Miranda, Manuel)
December 17, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Oreste R. Ramos. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11246077 by Evertec Group, LLC. Responses due by 1/2/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Miranda, Manuel)
December 13, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CheckAlt Eras, Inc. (ar2)
December 12, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar2)
December 12, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11236815, filed by Evertec Group LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Miranda, Manuel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Evertec Group, LLC v. CheckAlt Eras, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CheckAlt Eras, Inc.
Represented By: Francisco Oscar Sanchez
Represented By: Claudia Ojeda
Represented By: David A. Coulson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evertec Group, LLC
Represented By: Manuel Adrian Miranda
Represented By: Brian A. Briz
Represented By: David A. Coulson
Represented By: Oreste R. Ramos
Represented By: Maria Elena Martinez Casado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?