Pereira v. Kaika Sas et al
| Kullencampff & Konitzky GMBH and Kaika Sas |
| Camilo Agasim Pereira |
| 1:2019cv20657 |
| February 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Bankruptcy Order Dismissing Bankruptcy Appeal for Failure by Appellant(s) to Timely File Notice of Appeal, Closing Case. Signed by US Bankruptcy Judge A. Jay Cristol on 2/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (jc) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Parties Re Administrative Order 2015-9 and Amendments to Federal Bankruptcy Rules and Local Rule 87.4 Re Processing of Bankruptcy Appeals (jc) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jc) |
| Filing 2 Bankruptcy Transmittal of re #1 Bankruptcy Appeal filed by Camilo Agasim Pereira (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(dcn) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT (received), Bankruptcy Court case number 16-1106-AJC, filed by Camilo Agasim Pereira.(dcn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
