Longhini v. Saile Enterprises, Inc. et al
| Doug Longhini |
| Saile Enterprises, Inc., Victoria Weber Brook and Preston Stanley Brooks |
| 1:2019cv21713 |
| May 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER administratively closing case in light of #13 the parties' Joint Notice of Settlement, which indicates that this matter has settled in full. The parties are hereby notified that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, they must file a Stipulation or Notice of Dismissal and/or Settlement Agreement along with any other pertinent document necessary to conclude this action. Any pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement Joint Notice of Settlement by Doug Longhini (Perez, Anthony) |
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall file its report regarding whether it intends to remediate the alleged deficiencies and pay reasonable attorney's fees on or before June 11, 2019. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time 21 day Extention to file Report to Remediate Deficiencies by Saile Enterprises, Inc.. Responses due by 6/4/2019 (Duran, Pelayo) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Doug Longhini. Preston Stanley Brooks served on 5/6/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (Perez, Anthony) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Doug Longhini. Saile Enterprises, Inc. served on 5/8/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. (Perez, Anthony) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Doug Longhini. Victoria Weber Brook served on 5/6/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (Perez, Anthony) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Saile Enterprises, Inc.. Saile Enterprises, Inc. waiver sent on 5/7/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. (Duran, Pelayo) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Pelayo M. Duran on behalf of Saile Enterprises, Inc.. Attorney Pelayo M. Duran added to party Saile Enterprises, Inc.(pty:dft). (Duran, Pelayo) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12181 et seq. In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED as follows: Within fourteen (14) days of service of the Complaint, Defendants shall file a report with the Court indicating whether they intend to remediate the deficiencies identified in the Complaint and agrees to pay reasonable attorneys fees in connection with this action, as determined by the Court or agreement of the parties. If so, Defendants shall include a timeline for remediation. If, upon review of the report, the Court finds that Defendants intend to remediate the property in a timely manner, the Court will administratively close the case pending remediation. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Preston Stanley Brooks, Saile Enterprises, Inc., Victoria Weber Brook. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s))(ebz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Preston Stanley Brooks, Saile Enterprises, Inc., Victoria Weber Brook. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11607121, filed by Doug Longhini. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons as to Saile, #3 Summon(s) Summons as to Preston Stanley Brooks, #4 Summon(s) Summons as to Victoria Weber Brook)(Perez, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
