METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION v. Teamsters Local Union 769.,
METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION |
Teamsters Local Union 769., |
1:2019cv22649 |
June 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Robert N Scola |
Edwin G Torres |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
09 U.S.C. § 0010 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 NOTICE by Teamsters Local Union 769., re #24 Plaintiff's MOTION for Hearing re #6 Order per 3, Request for Hearing, 27 Order Referring Motion, as To Parties' Agreement on Withdrawal of Request for Evid. Hearing (w/o Prejudice) (Braswell, D.) |
Filing 27 PAPERLESS ORDER referring the Plaintiff's motion for an evidentiary hearing #24 , the Plaintiff's petition to vacate #1 , and the Defendant's petition to confirm #13 to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for either an order or a report and recommendations, consistent with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1 of the Local Magistrate Judge Rules. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (zlz) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #9 Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 8/8/2019. See attached document for full details. (js02) |
Filing 25 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #19 Motion to Stay. Apart from being moot now that the reply has been filed in support of the petition, the requested delay is also denied on the merits. If the pending motion for leave to conduct discovery is granted, the Court may then allow Plaintiff to supplement the record on the petition with any evidence obtained in that discovery. Because there are overarching legal issues that the Court may have to resolve beforehand, completion of the briefing on the original Petition will facilitate the speedy and orderly resolution of the dispute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 7/31/2019. (EGT) |
Filing 24 Plaintiff's MOTION for Hearing re #6 Order per 3, Request for Hearing by METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION. (Beutler, Mark) |
Filing 23 Plaintiff's REPLY to #13 Response/Reply (Other) Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award by METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION. (Beutler, Mark) |
Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion re #19 Plaintiff's MOTION to Stay re #6 Order briefing deadlines, #9 Corrected MOTION for Discovery permit limited expedited discovery filed by METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION. (Zaffuto, Warren) |
Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re #19 Plaintiff's MOTION to Stay re #6 Order briefing deadlines, #9 Corrected MOTION for Discovery permit limited expedited discovery filed by Teamsters Local Union 769.,. Replies due by 8/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (CV-Arb. Humphries))(Braswell, D.) |
Filing 20 PAPERLESS ORDER referring the Plaintiff's motion to adjust briefing deadlines related to the parties' petitions to vacate and confirm #19 to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres to be heard and determined, consistent with the Court's earlier referral of the motion for limited discovery 10 , 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(c) of the Local Magistrate Judge Rules. Judge Torres may amend, or not amend, the briefing schedule in this case #6 as he sees fit. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (zlz) |
Filing 19 Plaintiff's MOTION to Stay re #6 Order briefing deadlines by METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION. Responses due by 8/6/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Beutler, Mark) |
Filing 18 ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 7/23/2019. See attached document for full details. (mdc) |
Filing 17 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Re: #9 Corrected MOTION for Limited Discovery, for good cause shown: Defendant's Response now due by 7/26/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 7/23/2019. (EGT) |
Filing 16 PAPERLESS ORDER referring the Defendants' motion for extension of time to respond to motion for limited discovery #14 to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres to be heard and determined, consistent with the Court's earlier referral of the motion for limited discovery 10 , 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(c) of the Local Magistrate Judge Rules. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (zlz) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #9 Corrected MOTION for Discovery permit limited expedited discovery filed by METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION. Replies due by 7/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email between counsel)(Beutler, Mark) |
Filing 14 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #9 Corrected MOTION for Discovery permit limited expedited discovery by Teamsters Local Union 769.,. (Braswell, D.) |
Filing 13 Defendant's RESPONSE to #1 Motion (Complaint) to Confirm/Vacate/Modify or Correct Arbitration Award, and Motion to Confirm Award by Teamsters Local Union 769.,. (Braswell, D.) |
Filing 12 REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres per DE 10 . Motions referred to Judge Edwin G. Torres. (vjk) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot the Petitioner's motion to permit limited expedited discovery #8 . The Petitioner's corrected motion #9 moots the original motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (zlz) |
Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER referring Petitioner's motion to permit limited expedited discovery #9 to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres to be heard and determined, consistent with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(c) of the Local Magistrate Judge Rules. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (zlz) |
Filing 9 Corrected MOTION for Discovery permit limited expedited discovery by METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION. Responses due by 7/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Beutler, Mark) |
Filing 8 First MOTION for Discovery Permit limited expedited discovery by METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION. Responses due by 7/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Beutler, Mark) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Howard S. Susskind on behalf of Teamsters Local Union 769.,. Attorney Howard S. Susskind added to party Teamsters Local Union 769.,(pty:dft). (Susskind, Howard) |
Filing 6 ORDER on Service & Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 6/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (lbc) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Teamsters Local Union 769. (lbc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION (Zaffuto, Warren) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The party(ies) on the summons(es) does not match the initiating documents (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (cds) |
Filing 1 Motion (Complaint) to Vacate Arbitration Award. Filing fee $400.00 receipt number 113C-11763608, filed by METROPOLITAN DELIVERY CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E)(Zaffuto, Warren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.