Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy No. 80901LH1827981000 v. Black Gold Marine, Inc.
| Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy No. 80901LH1827981000 |
| Black Gold Marine, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv23586 |
| August 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Marcia G Cooke |
| Jonathan Goodman |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Ramer Karcher on behalf of Black Gold Marine, Inc.. Attorney Michael Ramer Karcher added to party Black Gold Marine, Inc.(pty:dft). (Karcher, Michael)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 9/9/2019. See attached document for full details. (smz)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Black Gold Marine, Inc. (pcs)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11935813, filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy No. 80901LH1827981000. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit A - Purchase Contract, #4 Exhibit B - Title Transfer, #5 Exhibit C - British Registration, #6 Exhibit D - Application, #7 Exhibit E - First Survey, #8 Exhibit F - Second Survey, #9 Exhibit G - Email from Agent re Renewal, #10 Exhibit H - Agreement to Bind Renewal, #11 Exhibit I - Renewal Policy, #12 Exhibit J - Initial ROR)(Davant, Charles)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy No. 80901LH1827981000 v. Black Gold Marine, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Black Gold Marine, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Ramer Karcher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy No. 80901LH1827981000 | |
| Represented By: | Aaron Michael Dmiszewicki |
| Represented By: | Charles Stuart Davant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
