Bowen v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Jimmie L. Bowen
Defendant: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Case Number: 1:2019cv23952
Filed: September 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Lisette M Reid
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 28 U.S.C. 2254. On or before forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order, Respondent shall file a memorandum of fact and law to show cause why this Petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 11/20/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
November 20, 2019 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Jimmie L. Bowen.(Blake, Robyn)
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to File. Petitioner has the right to file an Amended Petition as a matter of course in this situation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). The Undersigned cautions Petitioner that relation back of claims is not necessarily automatic, and for any claim in the Amended Petition to relate back to the original Petition, that claim must have arisen "out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set outor attempted to be set outin the original pleading." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(1). All claims must be filed within 28 U.S.C. 2254's one-year limitations period. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 10/4/2019. (ac01)
October 4, 2019 Filing 4 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Amended Petition within 60 Days by Jimmie L. Bowen. Attorney Robyn Michelle Blake added to party Jimmie L. Bowen(pty:pla). (Blake, Robyn)
September 27, 2019 Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 9/27/2019 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number FLS100195353. (vt)
September 24, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (ar2)
September 24, 2019 Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00 (Not Paid/No IFP), filed by Jimmie L. Bowen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ar2)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowen v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmie L. Bowen
Represented By: Robyn Michelle Blake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Represented By: Noticing 2254 SAG Miami-Dade/Monroe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?