Lucius v. Luxottica of America Inc.
| Windy Lucius |
| Luxottica of America Inc. |
| 1:2019cv24681 |
| November 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| James Lawrence King |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 12/30/2019. See attached document for full details. (jw)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Luxottica of America Inc. (Storper Joseph, Beth) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document Luxottica of America Inc.. Answer due 12/26/2019. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Windy Lucius. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 12/4/2019. See attached document for full details. (jw)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint AND FILE ITS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Luxottica of America Inc.. Attorney Beth Hilary Storper Joseph added to party Luxottica of America Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Storper Joseph, Beth) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Windy Lucius. Luxottica of America Inc. served on 11/13/2019, answer due 12/4/2019. (Cunningham, Juan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Luxottica of America Inc.. (amb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief and Damages against Luxottica of America Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12141571, filed by Windy Lucius. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Cunningham, Juan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lucius v. Luxottica of America Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Luxottica of America Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Beth Hilary Storper Joseph |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Windy Lucius | |
| Represented By: | Juan Courtney Cunningham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
