LYTTLE v. INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
ELIZABETH LYTTLE |
INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY |
1:2020cv22129 |
May 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 Amended MOTION to Reopen Case filed by INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Replies due by 7/15/2020. (Gelli, Joseph) |
Filing 13 Amended MOTION to Reopen Case by ELIZABETH LYTTLE. (Teplitsky, Nathan) |
Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER denying Plaintiff's #10 Motion to Reopen Case for failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1(a)(3). Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bfk) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #9 Motion to Reopen Case in light of #10 . Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bfk) |
Filing 10 Plaintiff's MOTION to Reopen Case (with correct case number) by ELIZABETH LYTTLE. (Teplitsky, Nathan) |
Filing 9 Plaintiff's MOTION to Reopen Case by ELIZABETH LYTTLE. (Teplitsky, Nathan) |
Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting Defendant's #7 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to respond in the time prescribed by Local Rule 7.1(c). Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bfk) |
Filing 7 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, or, Alternatively, Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Demand for Attorneys' Fees with Supporting Memorandum of Law by INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Responses due by 6/24/2020 (Gelli, Joseph) |
Filing 6 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Other Affiliate QBE FIRST Insurance Agency, Inc., Other Affiliate Bank Of America, N.A., Other Affiliate National General Management Corp., Other Affiliate NGLS Insurance Services, Inc. f/k/a QBE First Insurance Agency, Inc., Other Affiliate Garrison, Yount, Forte & Mulcahy, LLC, Other Affiliate Integon National Insurance Company, Other Affiliate TWR LAW, LLC for INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY (Gelli, Joseph) |
Filing 5 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY (Gelli, Joseph) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY of Filing State Court Record (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit P. RFP to D., #3 Exhibit P. 1st Set of Rogs to D., #4 Exhibit P. NOD DT of Integon's CR, #5 Exhibit Complaint, #6 Exhibit Summons, #7 Exhibit N. of Service of Process, #8 Exhibit D. N. of State Court Removal) (Gelli, Joseph) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bfk) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT ) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-12919898, filed by INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit P. Complaint, #2 Exhibit Print Out from Website of Miami-Dade Prop Appraiser, #3 Exhibit Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations, #4 Exhibit Integon Policy, #5 Exhibit Integon Coverage Decision Letter dtd 01.31.18, #6 Exhibit Integon Repair Estimate dtd 01.28.18, #7 Exhibit Advantage PA's Estimate dtd 11.15.19, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gelli, Joseph) Text Modified on 5/21/2020 (cds). No Answer/Motion To Dismiss Filed. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LYTTLE v. INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY | |
Represented By: | Joseph William Gelli |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH LYTTLE | |
Represented By: | Nathan Teplitsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.