Campbell v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Harrington Campbell
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2020cv23743
Filed: September 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Lisette M Reid
Referring Judge: Ursula Ungaro
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER. Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid/ Case Closed by District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 9/11/2020. (daa)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 9/10/2020. See attached document for full details. (jas)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as the 1976 Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 3 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings in the United States District Courts specifically provides that there is no filing fee required for motions filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2255. Movant's #5 Motion for Leave to File is granted in part and denied in part to the extent that his affidavit will be considered in conjunction with the 2255 motion filed in this case, but denied to the extent Movant requests an evidentiary hearing at this time. If upon review of the motion the court deems that an evidentiary hearing is warranted, at that time, one will be scheduled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 9/10/2020. (nn)
September 9, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Affidavit in Support of #1 Motion (Complaint) to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing by Harrington Campbell. (amb)
September 9, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Harrington Campbell. (amb)
September 9, 2020 Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Magistrate Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2 for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (amb)
September 9, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (amb)
September 9, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION (Complaint) to Vacate Sentence (2255). NOTE: All further docketing is to be done in the civil case. (Criminal Case # 19-CR-20399-UU), filed by Harrington Campbell.(amb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Noticing 2255 US Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harrington Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?