Lucius v. Maternity IP Holdings LP
| Windy Lucius |
| Maternity IP Holdings LP doing business as Motherhood Maternity |
| 1:2020cv24312 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT and all deadlines are TERMINATED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 12/11/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice by Windy Lucius (Cunningham, Juan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Administratively Closing Case. Any scheduled hearings are CANCELED,all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all deadlines areTERMINATED. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 11/10/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Windy Lucius (Cunningham, Juan) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Windy Lucius. Maternity IP Holdings LP served on 10/21/2020, answer due 11/12/2020. (Cunningham, Juan) |
|
Filing 6
Order Requiring Verified Certificate of Counsel, Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 10/20/2020. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Windy Lucius (Cunningham, Juan) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Windy Lucius identifying Other Affiliate ADASure for Windy Lucius (Cunningham, Juan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Maternity IP Holdings LP. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief against Maternity IP Holdings LP. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13727153, filed by Windy Lucius. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Cunningham, Juan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lucius v. Maternity IP Holdings LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Maternity IP Holdings LP doing business as Motherhood Maternity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Windy Lucius | |
| Represented By: | Juan Courtney Cunningham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
