Torres v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Daniel Torres |
| Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| 1:2021cv20037 |
| January 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jacqueline Becerra |
| James Lawrence King |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s))(lk) |
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Special Process Server. ECF No. #6 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 2/18/2021. (nco)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. #5 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 2/18/2021. See attached document for full details. (nco) Modified text on 2/18/2021 (lk).
|
| Filing 8 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. Text Modified on 1/7/2021 (mee). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Daniel Torres (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) A, #2 Summon(s) B, #3 Summon(s) C, #4 Supplement USM-285 for summons A, #5 Supplement USM-285 for summons B, #6 Supplement USM-285 for summons C) (Teplicki, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Appointment of Special Process Server by Daniel Torres. Responses due by 1/20/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Teplicki, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Torres. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Teplicki, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The filing fee has not been paid. (jas) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Filing fees not paid. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Compliance of Filing Fee, and electronically pay the correct fees of $402.00 within 24 hours of this notice. (jas) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Daniel Torres. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Summon(s) 1, #7 Summon(s) 2, #8 Summon(s) 3)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Teplicki, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
