Sanchez Fischer Levine LLP v. BDT Investments, Inc.
| Sanchez Fischer Levine LLP |
| BDT Investments, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv20228 |
| January 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Marcia G Cooke |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 27 U.S.C. ยง 0185 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Clerks Notice to Filer re #7 Answer to Complaint. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see 8 . It is not necessary to refile this document. (pcs) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Consent to Entry of Final Judgment by BDT Investments, Inc. (See DE #7 for image). (pcs) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint Consent to Entry of Final Judgment by BDT Investments, Inc.. Attorney Ramsey Villalon added to party BDT Investments, Inc.(pty:dft). (Villalon, Ramsey) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT signed by: Patrick Doig by Sanchez Fischer Levine LLP (Purdie, Chad) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by Paola M Sanchez Torres (Sanchez Torres, Paola) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Sanchez Fischer Levine LLP re #1 Petition (Complaint) to Enforce/Compel Arbitration, 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case Civil Cover Sheet (Purdie, Chad) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (pcs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 Petition (Complaint) to Enforce Arbitration. Filing fee $402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14247973, filed by Sanchez Fischer Levine LLP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #5 Proposed Final Judgement)(Purdie, Chad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanchez Fischer Levine LLP v. BDT Investments, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sanchez Fischer Levine LLP | |
| Represented By: | Chad Scott Purdie |
| Represented By: | Paola M Sanchez Torres |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BDT Investments, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Ramsey Villalon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
