Mehmet v. Extra Space Storage, Inc.
| Badisse David Mehmet |
| Extra Space Storage, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv22071 |
| June 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION/Request to Submit Motion without Oral Argument by Badisse David Mehmet. (ail) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's REPLY to #7 Affidavit in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss by Extra Space Storage, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Suarez, Tanya) |
| Filing 9 MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT by Extra Space Storage, Inc. re #6 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint Request for Oral Argument (Suarez, Tanya) Text Modified on 7/12/2021 (amb). |
| Filing 8 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Badisse David Mehmet to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: mbk20001@yahoo.com (ail) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Badisse David Mehmet. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ail) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Extra Space Storage, Inc.. Responses due by 7/8/2021 (Suarez, Tanya) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Tanya Irene Suarez on behalf of Extra Space Storage, Inc.. Attorney Tanya Irene Suarez added to party Extra Space Storage, Inc.(pty:dft). (Suarez, Tanya) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Extra Space Storage, Inc.. (ail) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 6/3/2021 in the amount of $ 402.00, receipt number FLS100230544. (vt) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Extra Space Storage, Inc. Filing fees $ 402.00, filed by Badisse David Mehmet. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pcs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mehmet v. Extra Space Storage, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Badisse David Mehmet | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Extra Space Storage, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Tanya Irene Suarez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
