Blocker v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
| Brandon Blocker |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2021cv22181 |
| June 14, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Lauren Fleischer Louis |
| K Michael Moore |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE. THIS CAUSE came before the Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment. 2 . Therein, the Parties were advised that Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any and all proceedings in this matter, and should the Parties agree, they may file the Consent form found on the Court's website. Id. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Magistrate Judge Rule 1(h) of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the Parties are hereby ORDERED to inform the Court whether they consent to jurisdiction by Magistrate Judge Louis to take all necessary and proper action as required by law, including, if necessary, a jury or non-jury trial and entry of final judgment. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 7/26/2021. (thn)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore and Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pes) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14764745, filed by Brandon Blocker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s))Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Goetz, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blocker v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brandon Blocker | |
| Represented By: | David B. Goetz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
