Chaney v. Miami-Dade Police Dept. et al
| Joseph L. Chaney |
| Miami-Dade Police Dept., Sgt. K. Cox, Officer Perez-Almeida and Detective O. Morris |
| 1:2021cv22818 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE of compliance re #10 Order. Copy of Order and form mailed to Plaintiff. (daa) |
Filing 10
ORDER ON SCREENING OF COMPLAINT. The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be filed on this Court's form for 1983 actions, which the Court will send him together with this Order. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to mail Plaintiff a copy of the Court-approved form for 1983 actions. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/28/2021. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner) form) (daa)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS AND ESTABLISHING A DEBT OF $350. The Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [DE #3 ] is GRANTED to the extent that the Plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. The Plaintiff owes the United States a debt of $350.00 which must be paid to the Clerk of the Court as funds become available. The jail/prison having custody of the Plaintiff must make payments from the prisoners account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. Plaintiff's Second Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [DE #6 ] is STRICKEN as duplicative of his first motion. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and Florida Department of Corrections. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/28/2021. See attached document for full details. (daa) Modified text on 9/28/2021 (daa). (Main Document 9 replaced on 9/28/2021) (daa).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/28/2021. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Joseph L. Chaney (pcs) |
| Filing 6 STRICKEN PURSUANT TO ORDER [ECF No. #9 ]. MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph L. Chaney. (pcs) (Main Document 6 replaced on 9/22/2021) (pcs). Modified text on 9/28/2021 (daa). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Suit/Civil Seperety in Individual Capacity by Joseph L. Chaney (pcs) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING FILING FEE OR FILING OF SUPPORTING SIX MONTH TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT. On or before October 1, 2021, Plaintiff shall either pay the full filing fee of $402.00 or submit the six-month prisoner account statement. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/2/2021. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (daa)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph L. Chaney. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against K. Cox, Miami-Dade Police Dept., O. Morris, Perez-Almeida. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Joseph L. Chaney. (Attachments: #1 Notice-Demand for Jury Trial, #2 Notice to Suit/Civil Separately in individual capacity)(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
