DAVIS v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY et al
| AUBREY DAVIS |
| MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, DERRICK GORDON and REGINALD D TOOKES |
| 1:2021cv24072 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), . Replies due by 1/25/2022. (ls)(per DE #9)
|
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Miami-Dade County shall file its reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss on or before January 25, 2022. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
|
Filing 8
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rodriguez, Eric)
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by AUBREY DAVIS. Replies due by 1/10/2022. (Pizzi, Michael)
|
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before January 3, 2022. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
|
Reset Deadlines Per DE#6. Responses due by 1/3/2022 (cqs)
|
|
Filing 5
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time 20 DAYS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by AUBREY DAVIS. Responses due by 12/27/2021 (Pizzi, Michael)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Senior Judge James Lawrence King recused. Case reassigned to Judge Darrin P. Gayles for all further proceedings. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 11/30/2021. See attached document for full details. (vjk)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. Responses due by 12/13/2021 (Rodriguez, Eric)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Amended Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15185539, filed by REGINALD D TOOKES, DERRICK GORDON, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. No Answer has been attached. Motion to Dismiss has been attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit Order, #4 Exhibit Additional Papers filed in State Case, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rodriguez, Eric) (ebz).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
