Snyder v. General Motors LLC
Roger Snyder |
General Motors LLC |
1:2021cv24256 |
December 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Beth Bloom |
Personal Property: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER granting ECF No. #9 Motion for Extension of Time. The parties shall file their Joint Scheduling Report and Proposed Scheduling Order no later than February 7, 2022. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (ta00) |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #4 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report by General Motors LLC. (Dorough, Marisa) |
Filing 8 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement by General Motors LLC (Dorough, Marisa) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting ECF No. #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to Amended Complaint, ECF No. #5 , by February 10, 2022. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (ta00) |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #5 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal by General Motors LLC. Attorney Samuel Lanier Felker added to party General Motors LLC(pty:dft). (Felker, Samuel) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against General Motors LLC, filed by Roger Snyder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Grossman, Lindsey) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 12/6/2021. See attached document for full details. (ail) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to General Motors LLC. (amb) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against General Motors LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15221741, filed by Roger Snyder. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Criden, Michael) Text Modified on 12/6/2021 (ail). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Snyder v. General Motors LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roger Snyder | |
Represented By: | Michael Elliot Criden |
Represented By: | Lindsey Caryn Grossman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: General Motors LLC | |
Represented By: | Marisa Rosen Dorough |
Represented By: | Samuel Lanier Felker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.