Nero v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Dorothy Castella Nero |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2022cv20959 |
| March 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Beth Bloom |
| Alicia M Otazo-Reyes |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 5/1/2022. See attached document for full details. (cqs)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (cqs) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Dorothy Castella Nero (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons) (Brady, Daniel) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/30/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dorothy Castella Nero. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom and Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Dorothy Castella Nero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Letter to Clerk, #4 In Forma Pauperis)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Brady, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nero v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dorothy Castella Nero | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Brady |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
