Chery v. Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund et al
| Hazine Chermon Chery |
| Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund, Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Municipal Income Fund, State of Florida Department of Health Vital Statistics, United States Social Security Administration, United States Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service and Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago |
| 1:2022cv21008 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 PAPERLESS Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summonses cannot be issued. Summonses NOT issued for the following reasons - Drafted proposed summonses contain inaccurate information and the parties do not match the complaint. The Plaintiff is instructed to either use the AO 440 form located on the courts website or draft corrected summonses for issuance. (ail) |
| Filing 6 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 4/11/2022 in the amount of $ 402.00, receipt number FLS248430. (vt) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bhy) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE of Return for Insufficient filing fee. (vt) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Filing Deficiency Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Hazine Chermon Chery. Case not filed with required filing fees of $ 402.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1914(a), and the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Summons(es) will not be issued until the filing fee is paid or an order granting the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is entered. (mab) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund, Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Municipal Income Fund, State of Florida Department of Health Vital Statistics, United States Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service, and United States Social Security Administration. Filing fees $ 402.00, filed by Hazine Chermon Chery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summon(s), #4 Certification, #5 Proposed Warrant, #6 Interrogatories, #7 Verification of Complaint)(mab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
