Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. et al v. Luis & Company, Inc. et al
| Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A., Van Cleef & Arpels, Cartier International AG and Cartier |
| Luis & Company, Inc. doing business as Goldie's Jewelry and Goldie Shienbaum |
| 1:2022cv21974 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Chris M McAliley |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on #34 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time for the Parties to File the Joint Conference Report and Joint Proposed Scheduling Order. For good cause shown, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that #34 Defendants' Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.On or before twenty (20) days after the last Defendant in this case responds to the Complaint, the Parties shall file a Joint Conference Report and Joint Proposed Scheduling Order, in accordance with the rules and format set forth in #22 the Court's Order of Referral and Notice of Court Practice and Procedures, as well as the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida and this Court's Practices and Procedures. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/28/2022. (sgm)
|
| Filing 34 MOTION for Extension of Time To File Joint Proposed Scheduling Order re #22 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,, Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other, by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A.. Responses due by 8/10/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 33 NOTICE by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. re #22 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,, Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other, Notice of Serving Order on Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order) (Stein, Mark) |
|
Filing 32
ORDER granting #30 Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Shelby P. Rokito; denying as moot #25 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Shelby P. Rokito. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley on 7/26/2022. See attached document for full details. (rr00)
|
|
Filing 31
ORDER granting #29 Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney John P. Margiotta; denying as moot #24 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney John P. Margiotta. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley on 7/26/2022. See attached document for full details. (rr00)
|
| Filing 30 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Shelby P. Rokito. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Amended/Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed - Filing Fees Previously Paid. See #25 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A.. Responses due by 8/3/2022 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 29 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for John P. Margiotta. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Amended/Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed - Filing Fees Previously Paid. See #24 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A.. Responses due by 8/3/2022 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 28 PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kathleen M. Williams: Telephone Status Conference held on 7/20/2022. Counsel of record present. Court Reporter: Patricia Sanders, 305-523-5548 / Patricia_Sanders@flsd.uscourts.gov. (mso) |
| Filing 27 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A., Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels. Luis & Company, Inc. served on 7/19/2022, response/answer due 8/9/2022. (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 26 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A., Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels. Goldie Shienbaum served on 7/19/2022, response/answer due 8/9/2022. (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Shelby P. Rokito. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15804139 by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A.. Responses due by 8/3/2022 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 24 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for John P. Margiotta. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15804097 by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A.. Responses due by 8/3/2022 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stein, Mark) |
|
Filing 23
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a Telephonic Status Conference is SET for July 20, 2022 at 3:00 PM, at which John P. Margiotta, Shelby P. Rokito, and Mark Evan Stein shall each appear. The Parties shall dial-in at least five (5) minutes before the scheduled start of the Telephonic Status Conference. Dial Toll-Free Number: 1-888-684-8852. Access Code: 7369700#. Security Code: 1133#.The Parties shall be prepared to discuss #9 the Clerk of Court's Bar Admissions Letter; John P. Margiotta and Shelby P. Rokito's subsequent failure to file motions to appear pro hac vice or other documentation required to participate in this case; and calls to the Southern District of Florida's CM/ECF Help Desk from an individual who appears to be associated with Plaintiffs' counsel.Finally, unless and until the Court orders otherwise, Mark Evan Stein - the sole attorney representing Plaintiff who appears to be a member of the Southern District of Florida Bar - is the only attorney permitted to make filings in this case on Plaintiffs' behalf. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/19/2022. (sgm)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER OF REFERRAL AND NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURES. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley for all discovery disputes and non-dispositive pretrial motions. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/13/2022. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 21 Summons Issued as to Luis & Company, Inc. (drz) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. re #1 Complaint filed by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 19 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. Summons NOT issued for the following reason - Plaintiff's Name not listed under Case Style Information.. (drz) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. re #1 Complaint filed by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 17 Summons Issued as to Goldie Shienbaum. (cqs) |
| Filing 16 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The party(ies) on the summons(es) does not match the initiating documents. Party names must be listed first. Complete address not appearing on this document. One party per summons is required. (cqs) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. re #1 Complaint filed by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. re #1 Complaint filed by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 13 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. Summons NOT issued for the following reason - Incorrect Format. (ls) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. re #1 Complaint filed by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. re #1 Complaint filed by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. identifying Corporate Parent Compagnie Financiere Richemont, S.A. for Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 9 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney John P. Margiotta and Shelby P. Rokito, mailing date June 29, 2022, (pt) |
| Filing 8 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents from the Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Other Affiliates/Corp Parents. Note - Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents do not appear on the docket sheet. (jas) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Compliance by filing Civil Cover Sheet by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. re 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cartier, Cartier International AG, Van Cleef & Arpels, Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. (Stein, Mark) |
| Filing 5 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (jua) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (jua) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (jua) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15749611, filed by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - D)(Stein, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
