Sanchez v. Aces Acerotech Industries Inc. et al
| Eduardo Sanchez |
| Aces Acerotech Industries Inc. and Jorge A. Sanders |
| 1:2022cv23050 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Clerk's Entry of Default as to ACES ACEROTECH INDUSTRIES INC., JORGE A. SANDERS - Motions Terminated: #12 Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default, Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 11/18/2022. (amb) |
| Filing 12 Plaintiff's MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default as to All Defendants by Eduardo Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Mail to Jorge A. Sanders, #2 Exhibit "B" - Mail to Aces Acerotech Industries Inc., #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Rocha, Jocelyn) |
Filing 11
ORDER ON DEFAULT PROCEDURES. Aces Acerotech Industries Inc. response/answer to complaint due 11/15/2022; Jorge A. Sanders response/answer to complaint due 11/15/2022. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 11/8/2022. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER ON MOTION TO REQUEST TIME TO RESPOND:granting in part and denying in part #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document Jorge A. Sanders. Response/Answer due 11/4/2022. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 10/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Aces Acerotech Industries Inc., Jorge A. Sanders. (pc) |
| Filing 8 Statement of: Claim by Eduardo Sanchez re #4 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, (Rocha, Jocelyn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jocelyn Rebecca Rocha on behalf of Eduardo Sanchez. Attorney Jocelyn Rebecca Rocha added to party Eduardo Sanchez(pty:pla). (Rocha, Jocelyn) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Eduardo Sanchez. Jorge A. Sanders served on 10/5/2022, response/answer due 10/26/2022. (Saavedra, Nathaly) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Eduardo Sanchez. Aces Acerotech Industries Inc. served on 10/5/2022, response/answer due 10/26/2022. (Saavedra, Nathaly) |
|
Filing 4
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, Certificate of Interested Parties, and Statement of Claim and Response in FLSA Case. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes for Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 9/23/2022. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Aces Acerotech Industries Inc., Jorge A. Sanders. (pc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15970258, filed by Eduardo Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Saavedra, Nathaly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
