MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
1:2022cv24157 |
December 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
Edwin G Torres |
Contract: Recovery Medicare |
42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Witness List by MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC.. (McGovern, Amanda) |
Filing 18 Witness List by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.. (Pennekamp, John) |
Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Join Parties and to file Motions to Amend the Complaint by MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC. Responses due by 3/2/2023 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(McGovern, Amanda) |
Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Witness List by MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC. Responses due by 3/2/2023 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(McGovern, Amanda) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER by MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Protective Order)(McGovern, Amanda) |
Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER SETTING CIVIL TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MOTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: ( Jury Trial set for 11/20/2023 before Judge Darrin P. Gayles., Calendar Call set for 11/15/2023 09:30 AM before Judge Darrin P. Gayles., Status Conference set for 8/30/2023 10:00 AM before Judge Darrin P. Gayles.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Ch. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 1/17/2023. See attached document for full details. (pcs) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE - Attorney Mercedes Rodriguez Cristobal has provided this Court with a current Certificate of Good Standing from The Florida Bar, and her bar member status with The Florida Bar is now eligible to practice law in Florida, Member in Good Standing. Therefore, Attorney Mercedes Rodriguez Cristobal's status in this Court's Bar is now in good standing. (pt) |
Filing 12 NOTICE by MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC re 6 Clerk's Notice - Attorney Admissions,,,,, Notice of Good Standing (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Certificate of Good Standing Mercedes Rodriguez Cristobal) (Cristobal, Mercedes) |
Filing 11 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Joint Proposed Scheduling Order)(McGovern, Amanda) |
Filing 10 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC identifying Corporate Parent MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC, Other Affiliate MSP Recovery Holding Series 01, LLC, Other Affiliate Hazel Holdings I LLC, Other Affiliate Hazel Partners Holdings LLC for MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC (McGovern, Amanda) |
Filing 9 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Pennekamp, John) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph William Donato, III on behalf of MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC. Attorney Joseph William Donato, III added to party MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC(pty:pla). (Donato, Joseph) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ana C Malave on behalf of MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC. Attorney Ana C Malave added to party MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC(pty:pla). (Malave, Ana) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE to Attorney Mercedes Rodriguez Cristobal, Florida Bar Number 492345. Please note that your member status on The Florida Bar website indicates your status is: Delinquent Fees Not Eligible to Practice Law in Florida. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and Discipline of Attorneys, Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, [t]o remain an attorney in good standing of the bar of this Court, each member must remain an active attorney in good standing of The Florida Bar. Additionally, Rule 9(c) requires you to notify this Court within thirty (30) days of your inactive status with The Florida Bar. Rule 9(c) further dictates that [u]pon receipt of notice of such action, the attorneys ability to practice before this Court shall be administratively suspended and the attorney may not resume practice before this Court until they certify that they are an active attorney in good standing with The Florida Bar. Therefore your status with this Courts Bar will be changed to suspended as [t]here is no inactive status other than for government attorneys in this Court. A Clerk's Notice has been docketed in all of your open cases. (cw) |
Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before January 13, 2023, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bhy) |
Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Pennekamp, John) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bhy) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mab) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16191225, filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. No Answer Filed/ No Motion to Dismiss filed in State Court.(Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record)(Pennekamp, John) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/22/2022: #3 State Court Complaint) (mab). Modified text on 12/22/2022 (mab). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.