Putnam v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Plaintiff: William John Putnam
Defendant: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. doing business as Royal Caribbean Group
Case Number: 1:2023cv24752
Filed: December 15, 2023
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jose E Martinez
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER Granting #9 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before February 13, 2024. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/23/2024. (knu)
January 23, 2024 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.. Attorney Tyler Jon Tanner added to party Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.(pty:dft). Responses due by 2/6/2024. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tanner, Tyler)
January 2, 2024 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.. (ebz)
January 2, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by William John Putnam (Brum, Adam)
December 19, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE by William John Putnam (Brum, Adam)
December 15, 2023 Filing 5 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Alias Not Added. The Filer failed to add the alias information for the party(ies). The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (jas)
December 15, 2023 Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect Party Role Selected. The Filer failed to select the correct party role. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (jas)
December 15, 2023 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (jas)
December 15, 2023 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Eduardo I. Sanchez is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (jas)
December 15, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD, a Liberian Corporation dba Royal Caribbean. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number BFLSDC-17146946, filed by William John Putnam. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(Brum, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Putnam v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William John Putnam
Represented By: Adam Brum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. doing business as Royal Caribbean Group
Represented By: Tyler Jon Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?