Seaboard Marine Ltd, Inc. v. Supreme Fruits SAC et al
Plaintiff: Seaboard Marine Ltd, Inc.
Defendant: Santis Produce LLC., Supreme Fruits SAC, Altius Logistica Internacional Peru SAC AS Ag and ROYALHALO LLC.
Case Number: 1:2024cv22261
Filed: June 12, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Becerra
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2024 Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Santis Produce LLC. (De Falco, Steven)
July 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Michael Angelo Saldana of the law firm of Pea Aleczander. ECF No. #12 . Upon due consideration of the Motion and all relevant factors, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion, ECF No. #12 , is GRANTED as to Michael Angelo Saldana. The Court reserves the power to withdraw permission for special appearance at any time. Failure to abide by any Court order or failure to appear at any scheduled matter may result in immediate revocation of counsel's pro hac vice status. Local counsel must be ready to adequately represent the party at any time. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 7/22/2024. (nsy)
July 19, 2024 Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Michael Angelo Saldaa. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-17692771 by Santis Produce LLC.. Responses due by 8/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Michael Angelo Saldaa, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(De Falco, Steven)
July 19, 2024 Filing 11 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Santis Produce LLC.. Attorney Steven M. De Falco added to party Santis Produce LLC.(pty:dft). (De Falco, Steven)
July 15, 2024 Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Seaboard Marine Ltd, Inc.. ROYALHALO LLC. served on 7/9/2024, response/answer due 7/30/2024. (Cooper, Jonathan)
July 15, 2024 Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Seaboard Marine Ltd, Inc.. Santis Produce LLC. served on 6/28/2024, response/answer due 7/19/2024. (Cooper, Jonathan)
June 25, 2024 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Altius Logistica Internacional Peru SAC AS Ag. (kpe)
June 25, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Seaboard Marine Ltd, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s)) (Cooper, Jonathan)
June 21, 2024 Filing 6 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons will not be issued for additional defendant. The party on the summons does not match the initiating documents. Filer may file a Notice of Filing Proposed Summons with the corrected summons attached. (kpe)
June 21, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ROYALHALO LLC., Santis Produce LLC., Supreme Fruits SAC. (kpe)
June 21, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Seaboard Marine Ltd, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s)) (Cooper, Jonathan)
June 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PAPERLESS ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES. The Court enters the following Order to apprise the parties of its procedures. The parties shall comply with the following: 1. SERVICE: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of summons and complaint to be perfected upon Defendants within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. Unless service is waived, proof of service must be made to the Court by filing the server's affidavit. If a Defendant waives service, notice of the same shall be filed immediately. Failure to file proof of service or show good cause within 90 days will result in a dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. 2. DEFAULTS: In the event a served Defendant does not appear in this action, the Plaintiffs shall file a motion for clerk's default within seven days of the deadline for the Defendant to answer. Extensions of time to answer a pleading must take the form of a motion to the Court. Motions for final default judgment, if applicable, shall be filed within seven days of the entry of default. 3. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES: Within fifteen days from the date the last Defendant enters an appearance in this action, the parties, including governmental parties, must file Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties must not include the undersigned or the assigned Magistrate Judge as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the Certificates. 4. JOINT SCHEDULING REPORTS: Within twenty days from the date the last Defendant enters an appearance in this action, the parties are directed to prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report as required by Local Rule 16.1. Disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l) must be made at or before the time the parties confer to develop their case management and discovery plan. The parties must certify in the Joint Scheduling Report that such disclosures have been made unless a party files an objection to a required disclosure. Such filed objection must include a full explanation of the basis for the objection. The scheduling conference may be held via video conference or in person. It may not be held by telephone. In drafting their Joint Proposed Scheduling Order, the parties shall utilize the Court's template scheduling order, found at https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/sites/flsd/files/TemplateSchedulingOrder.pdf. Any deviation from the guidelines set forth in the Court's template scheduling order or those proposed by the Local Rules should be noted in the Joint Scheduling Report along with an explanation for why more or less time is necessary. The Court provides these guidelines to assist the parties in proposing deadlines that are meaningful and realistic for the parties, counsel, and the Court. If the Court selects the trial date and dispositive motion deadline that the Parties proposed in their Joint Scheduling Report, the Court will not extend those deadlines absent extraordinary circumstances. 5. FILING OF MOTIONS: All filings must be in a 12-point font and double spaced. Single spacing is only permitted for footnotes. The required conferral under Local Rule 7.1 must be by telephone or in person. An e-mail conferral will only be permitted if counsel provided at least forty-eight hours for a response before the filing of the motion. 6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME: Compliance with all deadlines--whether set by Court order or under the Federal and Local Rules--is mandatory. Requests for extensions of time, including unopposed motions, will only be granted by the Court upon an appropriate motion showing good cause why the deadline cannot be met. Absent an emergency, motions for extensions of time must be filed no later than three business days prior to the deadline from which relief is being sought. All requests for extensions of time must include (1) the conferral statement required under Local Rule 7.1 specifying what methods were used to confer; (2) a list of any prior motions for extension of time, the basis for those requests, and whether they were granted; (3) a specific statement regarding the circumstances necessitating the requested relief; (4) a specific period for the relief requested, and (5) a statement as to whether the request impacts the deadline to file a dispositive motion or trial date. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 6/12/2024. (nsy)
June 12, 2024 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jacqueline Becerra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan)
June 12, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17601559, filed by Seaboard Marine Ltd, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cooper, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seaboard Marine Ltd, Inc. v. Supreme Fruits SAC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Seaboard Marine Ltd, Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan Scott Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santis Produce LLC.
Represented By: Steven M. De Falco
Represented By: Michael Angelo Saldana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Supreme Fruits SAC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Altius Logistica Internacional Peru SAC AS Ag
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROYALHALO LLC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?