Monroe v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
| Albert Monroe |
| Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company |
| 1:2024cv22376 |
| June 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jacqueline Becerra |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Albert Monroe (Macri, Jason) |
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. This Court's Paperless Order Regarding Procedures (the "Order"), ECF No. 5 , required each of the parties, by no later than fifteen days from the date the last defendant enters an appearance in this action, to file a Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement that contains a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, the only Defendant in this action, entered an appearance on July 12, 2024. See ECF No. #6 . However, to date, Plaintiff has yet to file his Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement in compliance with the Order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall file his Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement in compliance with the Order by no later than August 19, 2024. Failure to comply will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 8/16/2024. (ymr)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Fordin, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company identifying Other Affiliate Shutts & Bowen LLP, Other Affiliate Jonathan M. fordin, Other Affiliate The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. for Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (Fordin, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by no later than August 15, 2024. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 7/12/2024. (ymr)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. Attorney Jonathan Matthew Fordin added to party Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fordin, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES. The Court enters the following Order to apprise the parties of its procedures. The parties shall comply with the following: 1. SERVICE: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of summons and complaint to be perfected upon Defendants within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. Unless service is waived, proof of service must be made to the Court by filing the server's affidavit. If a Defendant waives service, notice of the same shall be filed immediately. Failure to file proof of service or show good cause within 90 days will result in a dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. 2. DEFAULTS: In the event a served Defendant does not appear in this action, the Plaintiffs shall file a motion for clerk's default within seven days of the deadline for the Defendant to answer. Extensions of time to answer a pleading must take the form of a motion to the Court. Motions for final default judgment, if applicable, shall be filed within seven days of the entry of default. 3. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES: Within fifteen days from the date the last Defendant enters an appearance in this action, the parties, including governmental parties, must file Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties must not include the undersigned or the assigned Magistrate Judge as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the Certificates. 4. JOINT SCHEDULING REPORTS: Within twenty days from the date the last Defendant enters an appearance in this action, the parties are directed to prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report as required by Local Rule 16.1. Disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l) must be made at or before the time the parties confer to develop their case management and discovery plan. The parties must certify in the Joint Scheduling Report that such disclosures have been made unless a party files an objection to a required disclosure. Such filed objection must include a full explanation of the basis for the objection. The scheduling conference may be held via video conference or in person. It may not be held by telephone. In drafting their Joint Proposed Scheduling Order, the parties shall utilize the Court's template scheduling order, found at https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/sites/flsd/files/TemplateSchedulingOrder.pdf. Any deviation from the guidelines set forth in the Court's template scheduling order or those proposed by the Local Rules should be noted in the Joint Scheduling Report along with an explanation for why more or less time is necessary. The Court provides these guidelines to assist the parties in proposing deadlines that are meaningful and realistic for the parties, counsel, and the Court. If the Court selects the trial date and dispositive motion deadline that the Parties proposed in their Joint Scheduling Report, the Court will not extend those deadlines absent extraordinary circumstances. 5. FILING OF MOTIONS: All filings must be in a 12-point font and double spaced. Single spacing is only permitted for footnotes. The required conferral under Local Rule 7.1 must be by telephone or in person. An e-mail conferral will only be permitted if counsel provided at least forty-eight hours for a response before the filing of the motion. 6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME: Compliance with all deadlines--whether set by Court order or under the Federal and Local Rules--is mandatory. Requests for extensions of time, including unopposed motions, will only be granted by the Court upon an appropriate motion showing good cause why the deadline cannot be met. Absent an emergency, motions for extensions of time must be filed no later than three business days prior to the deadline from which relief is being sought. All requests for extensions of time must include (1) the conferral statement required under Local Rule 7.1 specifying what methods were used to confer; (2) a list of any prior motions for extension of time, the basis for those requests, and whether they were granted; (3) a specific statement regarding the circumstances necessitating the requested relief; (4) a specific period for the relief requested, and (5) a statement as to whether the request impacts the deadline to file a dispositive motion or trial date. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 6/28/2024. (ymr)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Albert Monroe. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company served on 6/25/2024, response/answer due 7/16/2024. (Macri, Jason) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (jas) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jacqueline Becerra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (jas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17618941, filed by Albert Monroe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Macri, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Monroe v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Matthew Fordin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Albert Monroe | |
| Represented By: | Jason Phillip Macri |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
