Edmead v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. et al
Vedal Edmead |
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. doing business as ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and Ubersoca Cruises Ltd. |
1:2024cv24407 |
November 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Robert N Scola |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) will not be issued. The party(ies) on the summons(es) does not match the initiating documents. Filer may file a Notice of Filing Proposed Summons(es) with the corrected summons attached. (jas) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.. (jas) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Enjolique A. Lett is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (jas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD., UBERSOCA CRUISES LTD. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17971936, filed by VEDAL EDMEAD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Probst, Geoffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.