AR Design Innovations LLC v. Visual Comfort Of America LLC
AR Design Innovations LLC |
Visual Comfort Of America LLC doing business as Visual Comfort & Co. |
1:2024cv24620 |
November 25, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodolfo A Ruiz |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Reset Answer Due Deadline: Visual Comfort Of America LLC response/answer due 2/24/2025. Defendant shall file its response or answer to the Complaint on or before February 24, 2025.Per DE# 11 . (nan) |
![]() |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to complaint re #1 Complaint, by Visual Comfort Of America LLC. Attorney Timothy Dean Henkel added to party Visual Comfort Of America LLC(pty:dft). Responses due by 1/30/2025. (Henkel, Timothy) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by AR Design Innovations LLC. Visual Comfort Of America LLC served on 1/2/2025, response/answer due 1/23/2025. (Whidby, Kristin) |
![]() |
Filing 7 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney C. Matthew Rozier, mailing date November 25, 2024 (nwn) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AR Design Innovations LLC (Whidby, Kristin) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Visual Comfort Of America LLC. (pc) |
Filing 4 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (pc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by AR Design Innovations LLC (Whidby, Kristin) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Visual Comfort Of America LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18008528, filed by AR Design Innovations LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. U.S. Patent No. 7,277,572, #2 Exhibit B. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,277,572, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Whidby, Kristin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: AR Design Innovations LLC v. Visual Comfort Of America LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Visual Comfort Of America LLC doing business as Visual Comfort & Co. | |
Represented By: | Timothy Dean Henkel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: AR Design Innovations LLC | |
Represented By: | Kristin Michelle Whidby |
Represented By: | C. Matthew Rozier |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.