Hamlet v. Martin et al
Lynn Edward Hamlet |
Lieutenant Langford, Captain Martin, Assistant Warden Holtz, Warden Bryner and Officer C. B. Fry |
2:2019cv14219 |
June 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Lisette M Reid |
Robin L Rosenberg |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER denying, as moot, #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has already been granted pauper status in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 8/1/2019. (js05) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with Inmate Account Statement Attached by Lynn Edward Hamlet. (cds) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee but Establishing Debt to Clerk of $350.00. Granting to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/23/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with Inmate Account Statement Attached by Lynn Edward Hamlet. (cqs) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner filed his/her motion to proceed in forma pauperis but failed to submit the supporting statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months for any institutional account in her name. Accordingly, on or before August 9, 2019,, Petitioner shall file the required supporting, certified inmate account statement, or pay the Clerks filing fee of $400.00. Responses due by 8/9/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (fbn) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lynn Edward Hamlet (Inmate Account Statement Attached). (pcs) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner filed his/her motion to proceed in forma pauperis but failed to submit the supporting statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months for any institutional account in her name. Accordingly, on or before July 25,2019, Petitioner shall file the required supporting, certified inmate account statement, or pay the Clerks filing fee of $400.00. Responses due by 7/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 6/26/2019. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (fbn) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lynn Edward Hamlet. (kpe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (kpe) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Bryner, C. B. Fry, Holtz, Langford, Martin. Filing fee $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Lynn Edward Hamlet. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(kpe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.