Smith v. Lexington Insurance Company
Kathy M. Smith |
Lexington Insurance Company |
4:2019cv10159 |
September 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
James Lawrence King |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Kathy M. Smith (Parrish, Joseph) |
Filing 3 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lexington Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent AIG Property Casualty U.S. Inc, Corporate Parent AIG Property Casualty Inc, Corporate Parent American International Group, Inc. for Lexington Insurance Company (Sims, Melissa) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11981429, filed by Lexington Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 -Policy, #3 Exhibit 2- Complaint, #4 Exhibit 3 -Not of Process, #5 Exhibit 4- Property Appraiser Info, #6 Exhibit 5 -Client Declaration, #7 Exhibit 6 - D's RFP, #8 Exhibit 7 -D's Interrogs, #9 Exhibit 8- P's Estimate, #10 Exhibit 9 -D's NOA, #11 Exhibit 10- D's MET to resp to Comp, #12 Exhibit 11- D's 2nd MET, #13 Exhibit 12 - D's MET to resp to Discov, #14 Exhibit 13 - D's MET to resp to Discov, #15 Exhibit 14- D's 3rd MET to resp to Comp, #16 Exhibit 15 -Answer and AD, #17 Exhibit 16- D's Resp to RFA, #18 Exhibit 17-D's NOS Ans to Interrogs, #19 Exhibit 18- D's Resp to RFP, #20 Exhibit 19- D's Exh List, #21 Exhibit 20- D's Witn List, #22 Exhibit 21 -D's MTC Disco Resps, #23 Exhibit 22- D's Exparte MTC, #24 Exhibit 23 - Order, #25 Exhibit 24- P's NOS Interrogs, #26 Exhibit 25 - P's RFP, #27 Exhibit 26 -P's RFA)(Sims, Melissa) Text Modified on 9/13/2019 (cds). Answer Filed (See Exh.#16)/No Motion To Dismiss Filed. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smith v. Lexington Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kathy M. Smith | |
Represented By: | Joseph Allen Parrish, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lexington Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Melissa M. Sims |
Represented By: | Bruno Andre Garofalo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.