Neiman v. Hudson Real Estate Advisors, LLC

Plaintiff: Steven H. Neiman
Defendant: Hudson Real Estate Advisors, LLC
Case Number: 9:2016cv81738
Filed: October 17, 2016
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Office: West Palm Beach Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Dave Lee Brannon
Presiding Judge: Robin L. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 17, 2016 17 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) (eo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neiman v. Hudson Real Estate Advisors, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven H. Neiman
Represented By: Amanda J. Lavis(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Craig Salner
Represented By: Spencer Hal Silverglate
Represented By: Michael W. Winfield(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hudson Real Estate Advisors, LLC
Represented By: Thomas U. Graner
Represented By: Steven K. Platzek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?